1. Home
  2. Products
  3. Capacitors

Capacitor - 50V, Axial Lead Electrolytic

Capacitor - 50V, Axial Lead Electrolytic

Capacitor - 50V, Axial Lead Electrolytic image 1
Click to zoom in
Customer Images:
No Images yet! Submit a product image below!
Starting at: $0.35
In Stock

High quality low leakage tubular electrolytic capacitor. Rated for 85° C operation. Tolerance -20%, +50%.

SKU:
C-ET-50
Item ID:
001591
Brand:
Generic
Capacitance:
1 µF, 10 µF, 22 µF, 220 µF, 25 µF, 33 µF, 47 µF, 4.7 µF, 50 µF
Termination Style:
Axial Leads
Type:
Electrolytic
Voltage Rating:
50 V
RoHS Compliant
Part Numbers
Capacitance - µFOur Part NumberUPC/EAN
1 µFC-ET1-50841358108730
4.7 µFC-ET4D7-50841358108747
10 µFC-ET10-50841358102929
22 µFC-ET22-50841358103186
25 µFC-ET25-50841358103223
33 µFC-ET33-50841358103230
47 µFC-ET47-50841358103254
50 µFC-ET50-50609722133043
220 µFC-ET220-50609722133081
Product Measurements by Type
Diameter1 µF versionC-ET1-500.245 in.
4.7 µF versionC-ET4D7-500.245 in.
10 µF versionC-ET10-500.23 in.
22 µF versionC-ET22-500.24 in.
25 µF versionC-ET25-500.24 in.
33 µF versionC-ET33-500.23 in.
47 µF versionC-ET47-500.32 in.
50 µF versionC-ET50-500.31 in.
220 µF versionC-ET220-500.39 in.
Item Length1 µF versionC-ET1-500.51 in.
4.7 µF versionC-ET4D7-500.51 in.
10 µF versionC-ET10-500.5 in.
22 µF versionC-ET22-500.5 in.
25 µF versionC-ET25-500.5 in.
33 µF versionC-ET33-500.5 in.
47 µF versionC-ET47-500.63 in.
50 µF versionC-ET50-500.51 in.
220 µF versionC-ET220-500.66 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage1 µF versionC-ET1-5050V
4.7 µF versionC-ET4D7-5050 V
10 µF versionC-ET10-5050 V
22 µF versionC-ET22-5050 V
25 µF versionC-ET25-5050 V
33 µF versionC-ET33-5050 V
47 µF versionC-ET47-5050 V
50 µF versionC-ET50-5050 V
220 µF versionC-ET220-5050 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
Packaging Information
Packaging Dimensions1 µF versionC-ET1-500.512 in. × 0.25 in. × 0.25 in.
4.7 µF versionC-ET4D7-500.512 in. × 0.25 in. × 0.25 in.
10 µF versionC-ET10-503.8 in. × 0.3 in. × 0.3 in.
22 µF versionC-ET22-503.8 in. × 0.3 in. × 0.3 in.
25 µF versionC-ET25-503.8 in. × 0.3 in. × 0.3 in.
33 µF versionC-ET33-503.8 in. × 0.3 in. × 0.3 in.
47 µF versionC-ET47-503.8 in. × 0.3 in. × 0.3 in.
50 µF versionC-ET50-503.8 in. × 0.4 in. × 0.4 in.
220 µF versionC-ET220-504 in. × 0.4 in. × 0.4 in.
Weight (Packaging)1 µF versionC-ET1-500.004 lbs.
4.7 µF versionC-ET4D7-500.004 lbs.
10 µF versionC-ET10-500.002 lbs.
22 µF versionC-ET22-500.002 lbs.
25 µF versionC-ET25-500.002 lbs.
33 µF versionC-ET33-500.002 lbs.
47 µF versionC-ET47-500.002 lbs.
50 µF versionC-ET50-500.002 lbs.
220 µF versionC-ET220-500.004 lbs.
Product Measurements by Item
C-ET22-50 - 22 µF versionDiameter0.24 in.
Item Length0.5 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET25-50 - 25 µF versionDiameter0.24 in.
Item Length0.5 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET33-50 - 33 µF versionDiameter0.23 in.
Item Length0.5 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET50-50 - 50 µF versionDiameter0.31 in.
Item Length0.51 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET220-50 - 220 µF versionDiameter0.39 in.
Item Length0.66 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET10-50 - 10 µF versionDiameter0.23 in.
Item Length0.5 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET1-50 - 1 µF versionDiameter0.245 in.
Item Length0.51 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET4D7-50 - 4.7 µF versionDiameter0.245 in.
Item Length0.51 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%
C-ET47-50 - 47 µF versionDiameter0.32 in.
Item Length0.63 in.
Lead Typeaxial
Rated Voltage50 V
Temperature Rating85°C
Tolerance-20%, +50%

My Project Lists

You must be logged in to add items to a project list.

Questions and Answers

Click each question to see its answers.
Asked by Anonymous on November 25th, 2015.
JustinG
December 1st, 2015
Staff Member
Top Contributor
Yes, this would be a suitable modern replacement for your capacitor.
Answer this question
Asked by Anonymous on August 16th, 2019.
BradWbr
August 16th, 2019
Staff Member
It really depends on the application. When considering each cap has a tolerance rating (-20%, +50% in the case of this cap) so theoretically, the 33uf caps could measure at 30uf and still be within the tolerance rating. Most often these are safe to use, but you will need to double check based on the application the cap is being used in.
Answer this question
Terms and Conditions
Add a review

Product Reviews

5.00 out of 5 based on 9 reviews
juker01 - April 4th, 2022
5 out of 5

Excellent capacitors at an extremely good price.

Glenn Stevenson - November 30th, 2021
5 out of 5

Capacitors we're just what I needed for a replacement. They were used in 1965 Supro guitar amplifier.

Ken Gerig - July 25th, 2021
5 out of 5

I will always buy from this company as they are on time and fast delivery.

Rod Clay - November 15th, 2019
5 out of 5

Just what I needed! A quality replacement electrolytic capacitor for the 28V LV power supply in my SECO 107Btube tester.

Wolfdog428 - November 13th, 2019
5 out of 5

Good for my Collins 32s-1 got back on the air

Wolfdog428 - November 13th, 2019
5 out of 5

Good for my Collins 32s-1 got back on the air

Seth B Electric AAA Amplification - March 9th, 2019
5 out of 5

I'd prefer a 105 C rating but these work fine, just keep some air between them and any power resistors or other heat sources. 22uF vs 25uF or 47uf vs 50uf is rather inconsequential. 22 vs 25 more so than 47 & 50. The tolerances on these are usually +/- 10% at best, so 22 could be 19.8 or 24.2. When I ran roll off curve plots + or - 2.2uF made very little if any effect at all on the curve plots. A 35uF would be nice, but 33 is close enough too. 47 vs 50? With those roll off curves there is basically zero difference. With some cathode shunt cap calculations you could use 33, 47, 50, 56 or 68uF or even 82uF and the roll off curve would look the same. Changing the paralleled resistor would do more. Are these the finest electrolytic caps made? No. These caps are still generally better than anything in being used any mass produced guitar amps being made today.

BK - April 6th, 2016
5 out of 5

Good quality, inexpensive coupling caps. AES always has the right products at a decent price.

Jai Salvatori - November 18th, 2015
5 out of 5

Correct 50uf value! (NOT 47uf substitute.) ...Works good.